Ma, emailed you an interesting article called the Gingrich Gamble. It's a good read for the pre debate. I plan on an 830p starting time if that works for you.
I'm on Santorum's answer. Will fast forward Hunstman and suffer through Squirmy McSquinty or whatever you called Perry, Terry. Orange man is talking now. That's I am.
Bachman - cant spend more money than we take in. Absolutely correct. But that would require cutting the ENTIRE budget by fifty percent. Good luck with that.
Newt has to fight all the bad press he's getting from Beck, et al. He has to convince us he's a conservative. Commercial break. I'm fast forwarding. Don't wait for me again - I'll catch you.
Mitt puts everything back on Obama. He's not taking the bait to go after Gingrich. Conservatives are questioning Gingrich, Romney doesn't need to. He's almost making Newt irrelevant. Smart political move.
More regulations you ass? How about not having Fannie and Freddie exist at all. Helping more people buy homes?!!,! That was the problem in the first place. Omgwtfbbq. Newt is a fucking retard.
Not enamored with Newt anymore. The National Review article sealed it for me. No wonder the polls in Iowa are so fluid. 50% of us have not made up our minds. Last debate I was all Gingrich and hated Romney. Now Romney is getting another look from me.
Yes he is and he's taking all kinds of bait. He just defended government's mixing with business. I can hear Beck screaming "TOLD YOU SO!!!" Go get him, Bachmann. Told you she was good.
Perry IS confused. He thinks he's looking thoughtful. The question was too long for him. Perry tries to create a moment by challenging Newt. Dumbass, you can't cut Congress's pay or their time in Washington. Dumbass.
No, she's talking about judges MAKING law. That's what they're doing. Activists judges. Hey. In Iowa, the judges were on the ballot. It was our right to dump them.
Terry said...Yeah, the interpret it anyway they want, Happened here in WI. District judge halted a law for teh entire state because she didn't like the law. IT WAS FINE and did not need to be re-writen. Dumb, judges legislate all the time.
But where do you stop terry? Why stop at judges. How about jury decisions in criminal cases where you don't like the outcome. Dangerous shit newt is talking about.
I know. They are supposed to interpret but that doesn't always happen. The biggest problem is how judges view the Constitution - do they see it through the lens of original intent or are they constructionists? Big, big difference.
Paul's whole problem on foreign policy is a problem of his world view. If he doesn't see an axis of evil out there, then yes, he's being consistent, but I don't agree with his world view.
Paul. Really. Read something - anything - on the Middle East. Bachmann is exactly right and Paul is an idiot. Where the hell was he on 9/11? And sorry Beck - I'll take Gingrich over Paul any day. U.N. again. Go Bachmann!!!!!
I want to spend money on the military that is in line with bachmans suggested budget. Govt Only spends want it can take in taxes. No borrowing.
When you realize how much of a budget cut that is, you will realize how every candidates statement on defense policy is the equivalent of believing in skittle crapping unicorns. It's fracking unbelievable and it makes me want to vomit. We're either broke or were not Tese assclowns want it both ways. I hate them for this. They are not adults. Except Paul of course.
Maybe, but I'm sick of the flip flop accusations. How many times does he have to defend all those points? I'm tried of it. He's answered all of this already.
I just don't think the flipflop thing works any more. Move on. This is where people get irritated with the debates. Conservatives nitpicking each other. Santorum, you're not helping yourself.
Santorum can come off as arrogant and "me, me me" at times. I still think Romney has proven his stripes. If Gingrich is truly a progressive, then Romney is less dangerous than that.
Fair enough - but she is a TRUE conservative, and I agree with her on almost everything. Beck said tonight on O'Reilly that go would vote for Bachmann.
Newt-Roughed up but finished ok, tough showing Romney-back on his game, but still not sold Perry-Go back to Texas Paul-NO WAY IN HELL Bachman-meh, Santorum-Please Iowa, you're my only hope Huntsman-China
You nailed it again. I'm down to Romney or Bachmann for my "send a message" vote at the caucuses. I am now officially scared of Newt unless someone or convinces me otherwise or scares me enough about Romney. I think we're down to Romney/Gingrich unless there's a suprise in Iowa. The only 2nd tier that could possibly move up after tonight is Bachmann.
Ma, emailed you an interesting article called the Gingrich Gamble. It's a good read for the pre debate. I plan on an 830p starting time if that works for you.
ReplyDeleteMiM will be joining, but only to be snarky.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...On schedule for an 830 start if that is ok with everyone...
ReplyDeleteBret Baier has enormous ears.
ReplyDeleteTerry said....just started
ReplyDeleteTweet! Take a drink.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Romney is less orange today
ReplyDeleteI'm very attracted to Newt's jowls.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Megyn Kelly, she is all I want for Christmas
ReplyDeletePresidents don't grow the economy assclown.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt wants 7 three hour debates. Not going to happen
ReplyDeleteJust started so I'm a bit behind. This way I can correct you guys when you're wrong.
ReplyDeleteRick apparently wants me to be on fire. Kthxbai
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul gets the 3rd party question.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul said Obama is beating himself, too true
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Santorum has a creepy smile. Pause for 3 minutes Matt
ReplyDeleteMitt immediately begins by not answering the question. I hate him and I hope he falls down a long flight of stairs.
ReplyDeletePausing. Contemplating mitts death for resorting to sound bites and not just answering the damn question.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Yup, bad neck breaking question dodge by Mitt. I thought the question was good.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...where are you at Ma?
ReplyDeleteQuick fact - Bachman lives in the same town as the law firm I work for
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Bachman is an action figure and a real person, who nice
ReplyDeleteI'm on Santorum's answer. Will fast forward Hunstman and suffer through Squirmy McSquinty or whatever you called Perry, Terry. Orange man is talking now. That's I am.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...meant to say how nice
ReplyDeleteTebow? Die die die die die die die Rick perry
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Perry is Tebow, how stupid. I'm at Huntsman. Pausing till you catch up
ReplyDeleteThat's where I am.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Huntsman. Pretzels suck.
ReplyDeleteDeserve? Huntsman is a whiner.
ReplyDeleteRomney is getting in his talking points. He won't be the only one to do that tonight. Annoying, though. On Bachmann now.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Perry looks like a cardboard cutout
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry. I still like Bachmann. Just saying.
ReplyDeleteWe're you aware that perry was from Texas? I had no idea.
ReplyDeletePerry sucks worse than pretzels.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt made his 3rd Regan reference, IM A CONSERVATIVE
ReplyDeleteTebow? Really? Dumb. Dumb. Dumb.
ReplyDeleteThey weren't really balanced newt
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul sees a welfare vs. warfare congress, crazy man just showed up.
ReplyDeleteBachman - cant spend more money than we take in. Absolutely correct. But that would require cutting the ENTIRE budget by fifty percent. Good luck with that.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Huntsman got 80 percent in Utah, Fantastic, 80 percent of that was his family and wives
ReplyDeleteTerry said...at first commercial break. Will wait for you ma
ReplyDeleteTerry, in terms of spending, where social security and Medicare are part of welfare, he's not that far off.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...it's the warfare part that gets me, everyone but him wants to go to war and kill as many people as possible. Dumb
ReplyDeleteTerry said...still waiting for you at the commercial break ma
ReplyDeleteNewt has to fight all the bad press he's getting from Beck, et al. He has to convince us he's a conservative. Commercial break. I'm fast forwarding. Don't wait for me again - I'll catch you.
ReplyDeleteTerry said....Agreed on Newt, I still find the Beck thing interesting
ReplyDeleteHere it is. Mitt vs. Newt.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Yeah Mitt, Newt doesn't get that every business succeeds.
ReplyDeleteGood answer from Mitt
ReplyDeleteMitt puts everything back on Obama. He's not taking the bait to go after Gingrich. Conservatives are questioning Gingrich, Romney doesn't need to. He's almost making Newt irrelevant. Smart political move.
ReplyDeleteTerry said... The good Paul just showed up.
ReplyDeleteMore regulations you ass? How about not having Fannie and Freddie exist at all. Helping more people buy homes?!!,! That was the problem in the first place. Omgwtfbbq. Newt is a fucking retard.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Again make Paul Sec of Edu, Energy, Hud and tell him to close up shop
ReplyDeleteNot enamored with Newt anymore. The National Review article sealed it for me. No wonder the polls in Iowa are so fluid. 50% of us have not made up our minds. Last debate I was all Gingrich and hated Romney. Now Romney is getting another look from me.
ReplyDeleteNewt is a commie.
ReplyDeleteNewt has chlamydia.
ReplyDeleteI get the first part - but what is "bbq"?
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt is getting hammered, justifiably
ReplyDeleteBachman making newt look bad.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt is flustered
ReplyDeleteBarbecue. It's delicious.
ReplyDeleteScam. Yes!
ReplyDeleteI'ma go up to Woodbury and dry hump her for that one word.
ReplyDeleteYes he is and he's taking all kinds of bait. He just defended government's mixing with business. I can hear Beck screaming "TOLD YOU SO!!!" Go get him, Bachmann. Told you she was good.
ReplyDeleteStop with the sexual stuff!!!! I'm your mother!!!
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt is floundering, praising Romney. Yikes he is looking bad
ReplyDeleteI'll vote for her if her vp is a homo
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell. I'm going with the first person I liked in the first place. I'm going to vote for Bachmann. Let NH and SC sort it out.
ReplyDeleteReally? Ron Paul is gay?
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Huntsman and Santorum in Siberia
ReplyDeleteRyan's solution is based on fantasy economic growth that is impossible.
ReplyDeleteI think the Fox people are hammering Newt.
ReplyDeleteNo, but sanatorium is.
ReplyDeleteSantorum. Damn autocorrect
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Fox likes Romney
ReplyDeleteOnce again, Romney focuses back on Obama. Very disciplined.
ReplyDeletePaul getting smacked for the one point of his hypocrisy I find credible.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul dodges on earmarks. But on the constitution the good Paul shows up again
ReplyDeleteDon't be dissing Ryan. He's Terry's man-crush.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Perry just looks confused
ReplyDeleteTher are obviously 3 too many candidates up there.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Perry is dumb, yikes.
ReplyDeleteRyan is not being realistic on the math.
ReplyDeleteTexas Texas Texas
ReplyDeleteTerry said...shut up Huntsman, a one note joke. I KNOW CHINA
ReplyDeleteTerry said....Santorum reviewed his Iowa map again.
ReplyDeletePerry IS confused. He thinks he's looking thoughtful. The question was too long for him. Perry tries to create a moment by challenging Newt. Dumbass, you can't cut Congress's pay or their time in Washington. Dumbass.
ReplyDeleteNewton! Take a drink.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...ha!
ReplyDeleteTweet! Take a drink.
ReplyDeleteWhen do they actually debate each other. This is Q and A.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Romney takes it to Obama. Back on his game
ReplyDeleteReviewing the map won't help Santorum a bit. He won't make it past NH.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...These have all been q and a, too many candidates. Newts gets religious
ReplyDeleteRomney is looking good.
ReplyDeleteNewt is a fascist commie nazi Stalinist mullah.
ReplyDeleteMegyn's back. Easy guys.
ReplyDeleteBs newt. Don't like the way the judiciary interprets your law. PASS A DAMNED NEW LAW. idiot.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt slamming lawyers, Matt is not happy
ReplyDeleteUh-oh. Newt brought up FDR.
ReplyDeleteHow do you abolish a circuit court? Dumb dumb dumb
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Bachman thinks the court is the least powerful branch of gov't?
ReplyDeleteAgain Michele, don't like the court interpretation, pass a new law. These people are starting to get dumb.
ReplyDeleteShe said that it SHOULD be the least powerful.
ReplyDeletePaul is being sane.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...it is not that I don't like Paul, I just DO NOT want his as president
ReplyDeleteNo, she's talking about judges MAKING law. That's what they're doing. Activists judges. Hey. In Iowa, the judges were on the ballot. It was our right to dump them.
ReplyDeleteRomney wins.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...yup, Romney finally cracks 30 percent (barely).
ReplyDeleteHorse crap mom. Judges just interpret. If thei interpretation is really out of line, revise the law so that their interpretation becomes moot.
ReplyDeletePerry doesn't even know how many justices there are.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Yeah, the interpret it anyway they want, Happened here in WI. District judge halted a law for teh entire state because she didn't like the law. IT WAS FINE and did not need to be re-writen. Dumb, judges legislate all the time.
ReplyDeleteThe judge thing just pisses me off because these people act like congress is helpless. Bs
ReplyDeleteTerry said...oh God here comes Paul
ReplyDeleteBut where do you stop terry? Why stop at judges. How about jury decisions in criminal cases where you don't like the outcome. Dangerous shit newt is talking about.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...BS Matt, Judge Sumi in WI, check it
ReplyDeleteI know. They are supposed to interpret but that doesn't always happen. The biggest problem is how judges view the Constitution - do they see it through the lens of original intent or are they constructionists? Big, big difference.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Don't agree with Newt, but legislative judges are here and do f things up because they can. Just re-write a law is dumb
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Crazy Paul just showed up
ReplyDeleteWho gets to decide what's a bad decision.
ReplyDeleteReally, Paul? The U.N.? Bomb that whole institution.
ReplyDeleteAgreed on the u.n.
ReplyDeleteThe Constitution decides. The problem is how judges interpret the Constitution.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul wants to plug his ears and shout I AM OK, YOUR OK, WE ARE ALL OK.
ReplyDeleteI think paul just had a stroke.
ReplyDeletePaul's whole problem on foreign policy is a problem of his world view. If he doesn't see an axis of evil out there, then yes, he's being consistent, but I don't agree with his world view.
ReplyDeleteI'm a need a job Say it fast
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Iran openly states it wants to destroy Isreal, but Paul apprently does not want to hear it.
ReplyDeleteGood one Matt. Love how Brett's quote of Obama got a laugh.
ReplyDeleteRomney lost me now. Spend spend spend spend spend.
ReplyDeleteRomney is looking very presidential. I Romney/Bachmann ticket would be awesome. Too bad Palin ruined that.
ReplyDeleteRomney hasn't done the math
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Crazy Paul is in full swing
ReplyDeleteIncreased military spending would be great. So would a skittle crapping unicorn for every household.
ReplyDeletePaul has done the math.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Newt rallying on the UN question.
ReplyDeletePaul. Really. Read something - anything - on the Middle East. Bachmann is exactly right and Paul is an idiot. Where the hell was he on 9/11? And sorry Beck - I'll take Gingrich over Paul any day. U.N. again. Go Bachmann!!!!!
ReplyDeletePaul makes Bachman look bad with the Kennedy reference. Hooray libertarianism
ReplyDeleteWe have enough money for the military if we scrap everything else that needs scrapping.
ReplyDeleteNo way mom. Not even close. Mom has not done the math.
ReplyDeleteThe Cuban missile crisis and Iran - apples and oranges.
ReplyDeleteSo what do you want to do with the military?
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Paul thinks Cuba has a right to have nuclear missles.
ReplyDeleteTorture in Syria? Why do we care ? If we care there, how about most of sub Saharan Africa? Holy war bitches.
ReplyDeleteI hate the way Perry says Izrul.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Perry just looks confused when he is asked a question.
ReplyDeleteNewt's ending strong.
ReplyDeleteI want to spend money on the military that is in line with bachmans suggested budget. Govt Only spends want it can take in taxes. No borrowing.
ReplyDeleteWhen you realize how much of a budget cut that is, you will realize how every candidates statement on defense policy is the equivalent of believing in skittle crapping unicorns. It's fracking unbelievable and it makes me want to vomit. We're either broke or were not Tese assclowns want it both ways. I hate them for this. They are not adults. Except Paul of course.
I wont comment on energy independence but will instead refer to the daily show episode I posted on this blog.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...nice BSG reference. But Paul is still a looney. My neighbor beats his wife and kids, guess I should not get involved.
ReplyDeleteBrandstad! Take drink
ReplyDeleteI'll take any of these assclowns over Obama. ABO. Shut up Perry.
ReplyDeleteQue es BSG
ReplyDeleteObama is an assclown as well. As are most democrats.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Battlestar Galactica, they used the work "Fracking" all the time
ReplyDeleteI agree about the energy independence thing. Probably the best piece Stewart has done. Love it. It's all rhetoric. Shut up Perry.
ReplyDeleteAh did not know that. Is that show any good? Never seen it.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Yup, best sci-fi series ever, just started watching Farscape. Huntsman's hair looks plastered on
ReplyDeleteOk MiM out. I don't care to discuss immigration and if I listen to 10 more seconds of perry I might become retarded.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...by MiM, thanks for playing along
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Romney flustering on the flip flop question.
ReplyDeleteTerry said....Flustered/floundering take your pick
ReplyDeleteTerry said...punching Romney time about gay rights/abortion
ReplyDeleteMaybe, but I'm sick of the flip flop accusations. How many times does he have to defend all those points? I'm tried of it. He's answered all of this already.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...goes back to his cred, real or faked for political reasons?
ReplyDeleteI just don't think the flipflop thing works any more. Move on. This is where people get irritated with the debates. Conservatives nitpicking each other. Santorum, you're not helping yourself.
ReplyDeleteSantorum can come off as arrogant and "me, me me" at times. I still think Romney has proven his stripes. If Gingrich is truly a progressive, then Romney is less dangerous than that.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Bachman is just not doing it for me, sorry. "I'm a serious candidate" she just does not get me fired up
ReplyDeleteFair enough - but she is a TRUE conservative, and I agree with her on almost everything. Beck said tonight on O'Reilly that go would vote for Bachmann.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...Romney takes it back to Obama, smoothed himself out after a tough showing
ReplyDeleteThat he would vote for Bachmann.
ReplyDeleteDid you catch what that guy in the crowd was saying?
ReplyDeleteTerry said....trying to quote the Regan commandment for Brett.
ReplyDeleteYes, Romney is back on message.
ReplyDeleteFun having Matt aboard. Can't wait for your wrap up.
ReplyDeleteDone...time for the round up.
ReplyDeleteNewt-Roughed up but finished ok, tough showing
Romney-back on his game, but still not sold
Perry-Go back to Texas
Paul-NO WAY IN HELL
Bachman-meh,
Santorum-Please Iowa, you're my only hope
Huntsman-China
You nailed it again. I'm down to Romney or Bachmann for my "send a message" vote at the caucuses. I am now officially scared of Newt unless someone or convinces me otherwise or scares me enough about Romney. I think we're down to Romney/Gingrich unless there's a suprise in Iowa. The only 2nd tier that could possibly move up after tonight is Bachmann.
ReplyDeleteTerry said...I just am not fired up about any of them. I am glad my choice will be made for me by the time we get to WI voting. See you tomorrow night
ReplyDelete